
"Great course"
Olde Sycamore is now one of the more dependable public courses for conditions and rates. It is a fun layout where you don't need driver off the tee very often and I've played it for over 2 decades. So it feels like an old friend when I get back here to play. The greens...
Welcome › Forums › Charlotte Golf › Emerald Lake › Reply To: Emerald Lake
I’ve only played once back in May and it was fine. I usually check LMTT’s course feedback board for recent updates: http://www.lastminutegolfer.com/MsgBoard/Graffiti.asp?BoardID=55.
I’ve played Emerald Lake several times a year for the past few years. I used to love it, then had a few bad experiences in a row — where they had just aerated or were repairing tee boxes — so I didn’t play as much. Based on price and playability the course was a bit overrated. I play it every now and then just for variety, not because I love the course or the price point.
If you’re in that area of town, Charlotte National is a better course in my opinion. Olde Sycamore is also nice, but more pricey. The Divide suffers from the same inconsistency of conditions / high price that Emerald Lake does.

"Great course"
Olde Sycamore is now one of the more dependable public courses for conditions and rates. It is a fun layout where you don't need driver off the tee very often and I've played it for over 2 decades. So it feels like an old friend when I get back here to play. The greens...